However ... that it can not be undone.
Today, therefore, went out a registered letter to the German Press. I'm just tired of having to endure constant warmongering - not even online!
Bonn, 4.2.2010
At the
German Press
PO Box 100 549
10 565 Berlin
by registered mail
Re:. WORLD Online dated 03/02/2010
Daniel Pipes: "Barack Obama should bomb Iran"
Ladies and Gentlemen,
the Press Code applies from 1.1.2009 for online media.
Therefore I would like to bring the above-WORLD-line articles on knowledge, which I believe is in no way incompatible with the ethical principles of the Press Code.
Nor is it with those of the German Basic Law, agreed. The Press Code refers in its preamble explicitly on the same and this preamble declares the same to his part.
Reasons:
The cited article calling for a war of aggression:
"Barack Obama should bomb Iran"
And: "He has to give orders to destroy the Iranian nuclear weapons."
World-line thus incites to an illegal war of aggression.
Wars of aggression are illegal under international law and are banned worldwide.
WORLD that actually calls for an illegal war of aggression and violation of international law, the following headlines illustrate:
"Cheap conditions for an attack" and
"Many Americans would support an attack."
Thus it is clear from the wider context of the WORLD Online article that this appeal is advised to international law and an illegal war of aggression against Iran from a particularly low motivation:
Due to the illegal attack and international law / the bombing of Iran to the polls (!) Of the American president to be improved.
Quote:
"Crash in the polls. This poor performance has caused an unprecedented fall in the polls and the loss of three important elections, which culminated two weeks ago in a stunning defeat in the elections senator in Massachusetts. [...] It needs a dramatic gesture to his public perception as a lightweight, Tinker, changing ideologue, preferably in an arena where the stakes are high, where he was to take the lead and where he can outperform expectations. Favorable conditions for an attack. There is such an opportunity: Obama Can the U.S. military command to give the Iranian nuclear capacity to destroy. "
In addition, satisfy itself, the title and the entrance passage of the article cited the offense of sedition under § 130, paragraph 1 and 2 of the Criminal Code.
Reasons:
• The WORLD-online article is likely to disturb the public peace.
• It calls for action violence.
Here: An "attack", the "bombing"
• In addition to the newspaper article violated the human dignity of Iranians.
Here: bombing attack and are particularly suited to the dignity of man injured, as advised by wars of aggression and bombing of life and human dignity thus particularly at risk.
• Article 2 of § 130 (incitement) refers explicitly also of persons who are abroad -
Here: the Iranians.
The WORLD Online article "Barack Obama should bomb Iran" thus infringes in any way contrary to the requirements and the Press Code, to respect the human dignity of every person, regardless of race, religion and nationality.
As a German, it fills me with particular shame that more than 65 years after the end of the 2nd World war from German soil, that is, by a German newspaper, can be called up again to a war of aggression.
Resist the beginnings!
Because of the particularly stark violation I look forward to your further actions with particular interest!
With kind regards!
-
Friederike Beck
PS: Of course I reserve the right to report against the WORLD or the publisher.
System:
1 copy of the WORLD Online (Springer-Verlag) "Barack Obama should bomb Iran" article
Tags: Daniel Pipes , The WORLD , Iran , war
If this is the article - he is here with the author link in the net do not disappear :)
Barack Obama should bomb Iran
by Daniel Pipes
The World Debate
Third February 2010
http://de.danielpipes.org/7923/iran-bombardieren
Original English: How to Save the Obama Presidency: Bomb Iran
Translation: Daniel Pipes
Normally, I offer one presents, against whose election I was, I fear its objectives and against the policy I have been working on any advice. But here's an idea for Barack Obama, how can he save his tottering administration, as he takes a step that the U.S. and its allies protects.
Although Obama's personality, identity and celebrity status in 2008, the majority of American voters captured, these qualities proved woefully inadequate in 2009 for government work. He failed to unemployment and health care system, he failed with small (eg the award of the Olympic Games in 2016) and large (relations with China and Japan) foreign policy forays. His record in fighting terrorism is hardly a test silliness.
This poor performance has caused an unprecedented fall in the polls and the loss of three important elections that culminated two weeks ago in a stunning defeat in the election senator in Massachusetts. Obama's attempts to put his presidency back to the beginning of z, are likely to fail if it focuses on the economy where it is only one player among many.
He needs a dramatic gesture to his public perception as a lightweight, Tinker, changing ideologue, preferably in an arena where the stakes are high, where he was to take the lead and where he can outperform expectations.
There is such an opportunity: Obama Can the U.S. military command to give the Iranian nuclear capacity to destroy.
The circumstances are favorable. First, the U.S. intelligence community took their grotesque National Intelligence Estimate back in 2007, which was the report that was in the claims with "high confidence" that Tehran "halted its nuclear weapons program" was. No one (except the rulers in Iran and their agents) denies that the regime is charging the large nuclear arsenal building.
Second, if given the apocalyptic minded leaders in Tehran, the bomb, they make the Middle East, more explosive and dangerous. You could deploy these weapons in the region, which would lead to massive death and destruction. Ultimately, they could produce an electromagnetic pulse attack on the United States, with which the country would be completely devastated. By eliminating the nuclear threat from Iran Obama protects the homeland and sends a message to America's friends and enemies.
Third, polls show a long-standing American support for an attack on Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
*
Los Angeles Times / Bloomberg, January 2006: 57 percent of Americans favor military intervention if Tehran pursues a program with which it would be possible to build nuclear weapons.
*
Zogby International, October 2007: 52 percent of voters support a possible U.S. military strike to prevent Iran building a nuclear bomb, 29 percent oppose such a move.
*
McLaughlin & Associates, May 2009: "to use the U.S. military to attack the assets of Iran and destroy, which are necessary for the production of a nuclear weapon," On the question of whether supporting it, supported 58 percent of 600 likely voters, the use of force, 30 percent were opposed.
*
Fox News, September 2009: When asked "Do you support that the United States to act militarily to prevent Iran getting nuclear weapons or not?" 61 percent of 900 registered voters military action responded, 28 percent were opposed.
*
Pew Research Center, October 2009: On the question of what is important, "Iran to prevent the development of nuclear weapons, even if it means military action" or "to avoid a military conflict with Iran, even if it means that where nuclear weapons are developed, "spoke out 61 percent of the 1,500 respondents to the first response, 24 percent for the second.
The nuclear facility in Qom on 26 September 2009 from the space taken from 680km altitude - courtesy of GeoEye.
It is not just that a stable majority - 57, 52, 58, 61 and again 61 percent - the use of force now preferred; an attack, the Americans will probably rally around the flag can be, what these numbers far higher will drive.
Fourth: If the U.S. strike limited to the elimination of Iran's nuclear facilities and do not seek regime change, he would need a little "local staff" and make relatively few casualties, making an attack politically digestible.
So, remember how 9/11 the voters wandering in the first months of George W. Bush was a blow to the Iranian facilities Obama's weak first year would disappear from the scene and transform the domestic political scene. It would push health care reform to the side, causing the Republicans to cooperate with the Democrats, Netroots rethink screech, independents and conservatives can swoon.
But the chance to do well is correct, transient. Just as the Iranians improve their defense and the weaponization come closer, closes the window. The time to act is now or will in the world of the time when Obama held his post, be a far more dangerous place.
http://de.danielpipes.org/7923/iran-bombardieren
Thanks again - has gone online only at WORLD. Have been re-linked.
This includes:
"" § 80a inciting war of aggression:
Who in the territory covered by the law in public, in a meeting or through dissemination of writings (§ 11 para 3) the war of aggression (§ 80) incites, shall be punished with imprisonment from three months to five years. "
As well as:
"" (1) Acts tending to and undertaken with intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare for aggressive war, are unconstitutional. You are a criminal offense. "
"" If a war of aggression (Article 26, Section 1 of the Basic Law shall be prepared ...... ...... not with life imprisonment or imprisonment of ten years. "
Well no wonder that the WORLD has removed this mess.
Greeting
Jake
I have this morning been filed charges against Axel Springer AG and Daniel Pipes to the competent prosecutor.
Greeting Vincent
Because I would like to join you - maybe take over zeitgeist contact?
Greetings Friederike
@ Vincent
Can you kindly disclose the terms of your complaint? I also want to press charges, but unfortunately I do not know how it should be formulated.
Thank you
chosen for free-it's not about Obama's Umfargewerte, is in a "democracy" to "Western-style" in any case always the one that the elites can just use it as a marketing figure.
The point is that Iran is one of only five countries in the world that are not controlled by the ruler of the world ROTHSCHILD.
The Iranian government is ever so cheeky honest to try to make the wrongs of the founding of the Rothschild State of Israel from the world.
This is the reason why the Rothschilds Iran's mortal enemy, but on the other hand, almost hope The appropriate position is to prevent _in good cooperation with Vladimir Putin that the world is completely in the hands of the Rothschild Pathocracy.
Well, I certainly am not, "Iran expert" that Iran is vermutl.auch not "controlled" by ausländlischen powers, but they have repeatedly tried to take influence in Iran to destabilize governments, see example: the overthrow of the government Dr. Mossadegh was in the 1950s, who wanted to nationalize the Petroliumindustrie ... Before the election, but it Ahmenadineschads some oddities, such as west views, not bothering to vote, which favored the election of the current president. MIr personally met the man too much the role of an ideal Beelzebub - now back at the Munich security conference, he gave orders to enrich uranium to 20%. How about something with bedeckterer action? one wonders there. Certainly there is every right of Iran to use nuclear power as civilian, like other powers in the region, which indeed have even atomic bombs subject, the exact number but no control. As for the quotes of the President of wanting to wipe out Israel, which may well now be considered resolved when: It was a deliberate mistranslation west news media, about, for example: even George Schrramm in "Neus from the institution" (June 2008) has made fun of. The quote was in the original way: "You (Imam Khomeini] have once deigned to say that the Zionist regime is a usurpation and illegal regime and a cancerous tumor that away from the side of the age must ... The Zionist regime is in a absolute dead end and your desire (Khomeini] will soon become reality, and this germ of corruption will disappear. "It is hard enough, but no threat of a nuclear attack and wiping off the map Is.
Finally, if you look at the map times: Iran is surrounded, like the time the German Empire: "Left, top and right" are the Americans. And Iran has in its history has never attacked a country. The bomb threw the other hand, the United States and dirty with uranium bullets today the countries where they spread democracy (Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan).
Congratulations on this step! Obviously you got in the office but the wind up, as it is - to my knowledge - the first time that it has withdrawn an item completely, and, although on several occasions the inflammatory article of Mr. Pipes, who were no less controversial leave, has .
While you will probably set a preliminary investigation, I am quite excited about the results of the examination by the Press Council. A complaint should be for these items of pipes already in, I think.
I hope that you will inform us on your side of the result!
Regards,
K. Weber
So this is just. Lord of the Western-style man who invented it with the help of his Wissenschaftslakaien, bomblets from a symbol of the apocalypse develops, stuffed into guided missiles and during the "Cold War" copied 40 000 times per block. The world psychologically blackmailed, taught the common soldier and officer, that the war is "just" the continuation of diplomacy by other means even if it leads thermonuclear. Bunker built for their own lives and to grant the elites in the post-apocalypse. Disappointment experienced, that the red opponent gives up so MAD is the backside, arms race is over, the American century is over, no real effort to pursue further nuclear disarmament, but, looking for a replacement opponent including a new threat, found him even self trained , slept and watched as the "new" with borrowed planes, demolition and land produces in a prime location, the land by "Red" who killed for you bombed and occupied the country as he had not admitted that! - Oh, whatever - bombed and occupied, a lie that a trooper, creates a temporary economic boom, its people lured into debt, legally enslaved, impoverished and stupid.
Therefore, one can not expect that warmongers and racists like pipes disappear from the land of dreams. The administration of hawks and jihadists may be over, but the guys in the area can be but of such a "Grinner" and would like "philanthropist" in the White House, even to a steal with the "wrong Teind", not the show.
The versions of "New American Century" will be pursued by the likes of pipes and other hawks at the mercy on. Even when the mouthpieces are in Germany. There is anyway no country that beats up his heels hearty if Washington is on the phone. The short Schandperiode with the guy from Hanover is thankfully over. Now with our top model in the Chancellor's Office, the White House can rest assured that we are the next skirmish in any case, here, and why is not directed against the Persians?
PS: Seriously, you can take the whole farce in global politics is not a real place!
Here is the original in the Google cache. The Internet never forgets:
(World article dated February 3, 2010 in the Google cache)
The article was in fact more than just rude ...
I was shocked. Even if you can already assume that an attack on Iran is planned and will be held.
It is more than regrettable as it slowly makes the people sharp and would again go to war.
Why not hold out a little?
Imagine there's a war and nobody goes!
Lead to respect for the courage and sense of responsibility to the Press Council to enter into the path and file charges!
Best wishes to you all!
Thank you! Even your Guttenberg-dosing is a real bright spot on the horizon. Keep it up!
Before to go ahead and send pacifist mime the pseudoempörte together with like-minded people, the World and Daniel Pipes prefers to The Hague, they would prefer to visit, because he who produces in her comment section Sun The wacky "Lupo Cattivo" has a decidedly inglorious, albeit short career in time-line behind him, during which he secreted the most vicious anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that were read there, ever. But the inflationary mention of the name 'Rothschild' would have on them immediately ring alarm bells must be, if their so-eagerly-righteous work had for world peace in general and the so vile threatened mullah regime in particular, not preoccupied. Perhaps she even googled the name on occasion commentator said in terms of time online. Because the Internet actually forgets nothing, little Jew-hating yapper.
HP. "As far as the quotes from the President to try to wipe out Israel, which may well now be regarded as settled: it was a deliberate mistranslation west news media ..."
Um no, this pithy slogan first appeared on the English portal of ISNA and was then acquired by Reuter. From the German translation was generated. The Iranian propaganda slogan used this way today, still on banners and placards as popular shoot for Western correspondents. The campaign for a "correct translation" was still mainly driven by Neumann and Fickentscher of the Workers 'Photography', which wanted to force a reinterpretation of Adolfdhimmischnatterepäng Antisemten of the "anti-Zionists". That they have the good Mahmoud following spells with his dirty thoroughly. And why the "disappearance of the side of the run-time / from the pages of history" should be better than the "Erase the map" probably remains a mystery, Ms. Beck. And even the funny Georg Schramm. Finally, this was also the proper end of the Nazis, after the industrial murder of the Jews. Namely deleting them from human memory / sides of the run time / history, as if they had never existed. And they would have done nearly as well. Whether we succeed the mullahs? With their help and their ilk?
Oh and the "Zionist regime, illegal structures, cancer" are all code for Israel and not relevant for the government. But they already know.
to A. Bundy:
Thank you for your detailed post. I'm also happy about a contradiction! In terms of reader contributions, I find myself unable to make prior to the approval of the respective contributions of extensive research about the sender. Of course the comment was highly criticized by you polemical. But, what we are here to welcome a debate and is therefore sometimes necessary to be able to withstand Equivocal. You can raise an objection, what you did, too. I really want to use censorship as a last resort for reader contributions. Regarding the issue of the correct translation of the famous Ahmenadinedschad-citation, it seems to me to be a consensus about the fact that the contract in the permanent criticism president with his speech, at least against the iraelische "Zionist regime" turned, not against the state or against the people. What he wants is to finally change a regime, one must ask because the only Arab / Muslim countries and bring about even active?
Mr. Bundy,
Welt.de the article, however, was very much grist for the mills of such people. There must not be surprised if they then begin to rattle. Such correlations are reasonably intelligent people know for sure. In addition, the echo changes for the right corner of little relevance to the criminal.
Regards,
Cache.
[...] The World Press Springer recommends Obama openly attack on Iran - this could be the U.S. president says Daniel Pipes points neatly in the world. Then the editorial office can then disappear quickly - bloggers are complaining about right click, [...]
I want to fight with you, my brothers and sisters! Please show me how!!
Dear Ms. Beck,
please inform me of a functional Abeln e-mail address. Their
> Altratofede (at) telefonica.net <does not work out of your imprint.
Sincerely,
Bert Steffens
Andernach
hm, should actually work. Here's another: FriederikeBeck@gmx.net
Hello Friederike Beck
may be that I left the egg out of old am seeking, but I think the targeted sequels to the Guttenberg-file, as only part 1 and 2
When it comes to Part 5 continues nachlesbar somewhere?
Thank you
casus
Please check back often times this month at Zeitgeist online ...
http://www.zeitgeist-online.de/shop/erlesene-buecher.html?page=shop.browse&category_id=2
Here is the link
Greetings FB
Hello,
have you read the following article:
http://www.ftd.de/politik/international/:iran-hilfe-fuer-israel/60125948.html
For my part I have filed a complaint at the police headquarters in Biberach, Department of State Security, on suspicion of incitement and aid in preparation for aggressive war.
Regards,
Andreas Geiger