Archive for the 'Legal basis'

The Brown Army Faction - Background

Tuesday 15 November 2011

There every year in Germany a bizarre voodoo ritual: you poking and pierced pupae of brown fabric scraps as long as with needles until they rear up again shortly, hit actually for a moment, their glass eyes, staring at the ritual participants in disbelief and zurückplumpsen again.

***

Serial murders of eight foreign nationals and a German police officer committed, the last four years, the Republic of warble. Germany is reunited with his past - his younger be busy, the murders took place 2000-2007, and the 60 years previous. In short, Germany has to be denazified again. Whether it likes it or not.

The cowardly murders are concerned Germany for months - at least. A takeover of Brown will appear again possible. The dismay of all those in solidarity with the victims, and be as good as any, will be unanimous. The opinions of numerous experts, we will have to go through us. Will it be the real "experts"?

The anxious question will be as always: Is the brown bosom still fertile? Well, we should ask these questions to the right people: The NSU, the "Nazi underground" was the secret service known since 1994, when he was still "Thuringian homeland security" and was even then was under observation.

Why the brown infernal trio was now of his life in the underground and its consequences have remained undetected and carried out atrocities tired? Yielded several successful bank robberies of the last unsuccessful decisive way to sudden fatigue life, the good life in a luxury motorhome to give up now? Is it brown sleepers who are depressed and suicidal on cue? And press the close button? Or there are others who umlegten the switch? (more ...)

Tags: , , , , ,
Filed under Basic Legal , Political | 3 Comments »

Self-sacrifice and EU diktat

Tuesday 16 August 2011

The Bonner General-Anzeiger was once a civic education information sheet. Long time ago. Every day he has delivered tired ideology. The latest example: Under the heading "Germany and the financial crisis. Task calls itself "the GA columnist Ulla Thiede from Berlin to bow to the dictates of Brussels.

Thiede occurs consistently for the disenfranchisement and disempowerment of parliament and accordingly castigates all those German politicians keen to call if the enormous financial decisions the current government with far-reaching consequences for the future after the convening of the elected parliament. The GA-journalist pleads for more contrast, EU Special Summit, not for the convening of the Bundestag, as required, for example, Frank Schaeffler (FDP), which they pure "self-interest" implies.

"It would make sense to convene the plenary only if the parliament could also choose something already. Namely, all the - very sensible - measures that were adopted in Brussels recently. But the templates are not ready for it until September. Coalition and the opposition should take care not without cause for debate in a vacuum over the pros and cons of monetary union ".

Yes, this is what the parliament of the future: (more ...)

Tags: ,
Filed under Basic Legal | 1 Comment »

Barcelona, ​​Rotterdam: disco-visitors can inject a microchip

Friday 05 August 2011

Today someone sent me a video from Spain, a television report directly to a trendy club in Barcelona by the sea. The "Baja Beach Club" nightclub started in 2004 as the world's first discotheque visitors who wanted to have the VIP status to chipping.

The "advantage": the doors open automatically for the chipped person, drinks and food can also be in a swimsuit or bikini paid easily with hand signals, the reader completes the sale and the amount is automatically drawn from the deposited account.

A very convenient solution for carefree entertainment, right? The large grain of rice RFID chip, also called radio etiquette can, for the rest of life left in the VIP, it contains a "transponder", ie it absorbs electromagnetic waves, it identifies and sends information and forwards it.

"Comfortable and safe," was the verdict of Gechippten. Also in Rotterdam took the idea a nightclub. Her owner said, would in a few years anyway, everyone chipped at birth. (more ...)

Tags: , , ,
Filed under Basic Legal | 6 Comments »

Stops Post narrowness of political haggling! Let us finally choose the President himself!

Wednesday, 02 June 2010
Margot Käßmann For President! Quelle:wikimedia commons

Margot Kaessmann For President! (Source: wikimedia commons)

Horst Koehler has resigned. That was a coward, because Germany is in heavy waters, and a captain is not the first on board (even though he has not the main control in the hand).

Instead of reporting on important matters of world affairs, the press torments us now with a long page and post Politgemauschel Schacher narrowness of the parties, which for political retirees will now end up in the cemetery called "Schloss Bellevue".

How interesting! Actually, the President was directly elected by the people long ago!

***

When it comes to Kohler are the things (as so often) ambivalent. Yesterday I was talking a conversation with someone who knows some of Kohler's advisor and have frequent contacts with them. According to Koehler to have been months behind the scenes with the FDP and Merkel "gezofft" and more and more isolated feel. For the FDP, it was alleged by the tax cuts that Köhler was impracticable. With Merkel's CDU, the reduction of social charges and extended savings, whereas Köhler said to have announced his concerns. Lately, he should have used increasingly for the "turbine control", ie the taxation of financial transactions that Germany € 12 billion per. Could take years. Whether the information is correct, I can (still) do not check the source, however, seemed reputable. It is perhaps in hindsight can still hear something on the subject.

One thing is certain: Kohler had repeatedly campaigned for more direct democracy. About this issue I have with zeitgeist-an online article posted: "More direct democracy: a way out of growing political apathy and declining voter turnout?"

Koehler told the WORLD about direct election of the President by the people: "I think it is an expression of anxiety or uncertainty, when this issue immediately recalls Hindenburg."

In fact, the established time and again choke off votes, campaigning for the direct election of the President with the word "Hindenburg". What does it mean? I quote from the above mentioned article: (more ...)

Tags: , ,
Filed under Basic Legal , Political | 5 Comments »

In Tyranny - Is the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty in Ireland, introduced the death penalty in the EU again?

Sunday 25 October 2009

A serious question, their answer with the 1200-page Treaty of Lisbon is not easy. Anyone who has ever read it from beginning to end? And above all: Do it our elected representatives actually read? I decide, in accordance with the relevant EU texts to search.

Reminder: Our constitution says in its Article 102: The death penalty is abolished.

Then we could leave been so pretty. For example, we could have been demonstrations sure that would even if masked "anarchists" against the will of the majority of the demonstrators started throwing stones at the police not to shoot suddenly sharp. As it stands now, we have to consider in the future, heartily, to which we want to demo in doubt, go. Because: A few violent "Autonomous" can quickly pop out of nowhere. But first things first:

First there is the Charter of Fundamental Rights (version dated 14/12/2007) that the EU had already proclaimed in Nice in 2000. She has had no validity, since the EU Treaty was not accepted by all EU members. The (penultimate) obstacle now seems to be out of the way with the Irish "yes" on the second attempt.

The said Charter says in its article 2. Paragraphs 1 and 2:
First Everyone has the right to life.
Second No person shall be sentenced to death or executed.

So far, everything seems in butter. The Charter establishes, in article 52 paragraph 7 determined that a "manual", namely the so-called "explanations" of the Charter are binding on all EU countries:

Article 52 Section 7: The explanations drawn up as a guide for the interpretation of this Charter shall be given due regard by the courts of the Union and the Member States.

And what to say now the most important explanations for all fundamental rights, namely the right to life? (more ...)

Tags: , , ,
Filed under Basic Legal | 1 Comment »